Open science refers to various principles and practices that enhance scientific research's transparency, collaboration, and openness
the principles of open science are integral to international organizations' strategies and official methodologies, providing a natural framework for evaluating science
faculties implement a variety of open science practices that align with their mission and research objectives
the most widespread policies currently concern peer-reviewed scientific publications (open access) and research data (open data)
Open access is a publication model that aims to provide immediate, free, permanent, and unrestricted online access to scientific research findings
immediate = at the latest at the moment of publication, i.e. without a time embargo
free of charge = there are no charges for the end user, shifting the costs to the beginning of the publishing chain
permanent = long-term access achieved by archiving results, such as in a repository
free = obtaining a public license that allows for legal reuse
Open Access journals feature a logo depicting an open lock; suitable periodicals can be found in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) database
Open publishing applies not only to periodicals but also to individual chapters and monographs
APC, or Article Processing Charge, is a fee that authors pay to make their articles open access (OA) immediately after publication
If the costs of open access are not covered by end users, such as readers and libraries, then they are paid by the authors and their institutions, who cover the fee
The DOAJ database provides information on journal APC amounts, some of which are free, while others may require payments totalling several thousand dollars or euros
Through transformative agreements, authors can obtain tokens with discounts or complete waivers for Open Access publishing fees
Open access can be achieved in several ways:
the article is published behind a paywall in a journal that typically charges for subscriptions, yet the author also makes the text available in an open repository
the green route is free of charge for authors and their institutions
the publisher determines the terms for secondary publication: they may establish a temporary embargo or permit the publication of the manuscript after peer review (postprint/accepted version) rather than the final published version
the conditions must be checked in the contract with the publisher: License Agreement or Copyright Transfer Agreement, or in the DOAJ database or Open Policy Finder registry
the article is published openly in a journal, and the publisher ensures accessibility
the gold route requires payment; authors or their institutions pay the APC as stated on the publisher's website and in the relevant contract
the publisher cannot impose an embargo on publication or restrict access to the publisher's version
it is crucial to verify the prestige and credibility of the journal due to the prevalence of predatory publishing practices. Consulting with faculty contacts can also be helpful
some journals employ a hybrid approach: they provide openness via APC, even without payment, the article is still available, traditionally in a non-open form
the article in the publisher's version is openly published in the journal, and the publisher ensures its accessibility
the diamond route is free of charge for readers, authors, and their institutions
here is a list of reputable diamond journals that you can refer to
The Open Science Support Centre outlines the steps for those interested in green and gold publishing, which includes diamond publishing as a specific type under the gold category
the costs of the green route align with the operation of repositories, which a university, other research organizations, international consortia, or grant titles can fund
the gold route is financed by APCs, usually paid by authors and their institutions
the diamond route is funded by academic societies, government grants, and publishers, particularly university presses
Open Access (OA) fees are typically considered eligible costs in project budgets and should be included in the draft budget of the project proposal. Within the CzechELib national consortium, significant discounts or tokens for OA publishing are available based on specific transformation agreements. The conditions are as follows:
only corresponding authors from Charles University are eligible to apply, provided they indicate their institutional affiliation in the manuscript and use their faculty email when communicating with the journal
tokens can only be requested after a publisher accepts the article; they cannot be reserved in advance
some publishers, such as Taylor & Francis, allocate a limited number of tokens each year and may run out several months before the year's end. Certain additional conditions must be met for these publishers to allocate tokens
The Open Science Support Centre records the current status of the number of available tokens and all conditions. It can also be contacted with requests
The regulatory framework for open science in the Czech Republic, as outlined by the National Open Science Platform, is based on European legislative acts and documents. The European Commission's recommendations have been integrated into the government-approved strategic document National Research, Development and Innovation Policy of the Czech Republic 2021+.
The primary legal mechanism ensuring open access is the public license. These licenses allow anyone to use a work under specific conditions, negating the need for an individual license agreement with the author.
Various participants in the publication process can determine the application of a specific license:
author: the author retains the moral rights associated with their work, which pertain to their personal connection to the creation, including the right to be recognized as the author. In some instances, the author may also hold economic rights, which grant them the ability to use the work and to license its use to others
co-author: in cases of co-authorship, all relevant authors must consent to the use and licensing of the work, based on the principle of unanimity
employer: if an employee creates work during their employment, the employer exercises the economic copyrights and decides on licensing, while the author retains the moral rights
publisher: The publisher may also assert economic copyright if granted an exclusive license, which can restrict even the author from using the work
funding provider: The provider may be required to publish the outputs under a specific license as part of the project conditions
the legal support team at the Centre for Open Science handles the application of all these principles to Czech law, especially the more complex transfers of rights in relation to the publisher
The collection of public licenses is known as Creative Commons (CC). These licenses allow authors or creators to grant certain rights to their work while reserving others.
A CC license includes several key elements of licensing:
the right to distribute the work (shared by all CC licenses)
the right to adapt the work (the ability to create derivative works, such as translations or sequels)
attribute the work (shared by all CC licenses)
retain the license (when you reuse, remix, or adapt a work, you must keep the original license attached and not change it)
not use the work commercially (the work can be shared and adapted, but not for commercial purposes like making a profit)
not to derive (the work cannot be changed, remixed, or adapted in any way)
CC BY: allows others to share, adapt, and build upon a work for any purpose, including commercial, if they give attribution to the original author
CC BY-SA: Attribution – ShareAlike
CC BY-ND: Attribution – No Derivative Works
CC BY-NC: Attribution – No Commercial Use
CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution – Non-commercial – ShareAlike
CC BY-NC-ND: Attribution – No Commercial Use – No Derivative Works (restrictive variant, authorizes free sharing, but excludes derivative works and commercial use)
With the rise of open access publishing, numerous questionable publishers have surfaced. These so-called predatory publishers profit from Article Processing Charges (APCs) while not following established publishing standards:
poor quality and disproportionately short review process
non-transparent editorial board
misleading metrics or falsified quality indicators
After 2010, predatory publishing practices began to be exposed, yet they also significantly spread, affecting journals, monographs, and conferences. This proliferation has led to various reputational issues for particular academics. In the Czech Republic, the Stop Predatory Practices initiative was launched, and several manuals and recommendations have been developed to help identify predatory publishers and their practices.
Due to the seriousness of the issue, it is highly recommended that you contact your faculty and university contacts if you have any questions.
FHS UK:
Miriam Vojtíšková: Open Science Coordinator,
Martin Mišúr: Publication Officer, Research Administration Office,
Kateřina Kovaříková: editorial assistant, Research Administration Office,
UK:
Open Science Support Centre,
copyright issues,
Research Administration Office
Univerzita Karlova
Fakulta humanitních studií
Pátkova 2137/5
182 00 Praha 8 - Libeň
E-mail: